<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why WolframAlpha Sucks &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t know what WordPress is!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogdesignstudio.com/mini-blog/why-wolframalpha-sucks-it-doesnt-know-what-wordpress-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogdesignstudio.com/mini-blog/why-wolframalpha-sucks-it-doesnt-know-what-wordpress-is/</link>
	<description>Best Wordpress Themes By Blog Design Studio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:55:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayank</title>
		<link>http://blogdesignstudio.com/mini-blog/why-wolframalpha-sucks-it-doesnt-know-what-wordpress-is/#comment-12110</link>
		<dc:creator>mayank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 07:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogdesignstudio.com/mini-blog/why-wolframalpha-sucks-it-doesnt-know-what-wordpress-is/#comment-12110</guid>
		<description>@ Marc @vivek  - Thanks a lot for comment. Thanks for the appreciation and for the feedback, however I think you misunderstood my intentions for this post. I&#039;m very much happy with WolframAlpha :) I used the tongue smiley (:P) to ensure that no one gets the wrong message, but I guess - I should have been more clear with it.
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m always in favor of new startups and new search engines as I love to see the competition, so I won&#039;t mind switching the search engine, if it&#039;ll provide me the search results that I&#039;m interested in. Guess what! now a days, I spend most of my time on Twitter and I make a point that while doing any research, I use Twitter&#039;s search. :)
&lt;br /&gt;
Next time, I&#039;ll be cautious before making these kind of PJs (poor jokes) :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Marc @vivek  &#8211; Thanks a lot for comment. Thanks for the appreciation and for the feedback, however I think you misunderstood my intentions for this post. I&#8217;m very much happy with WolframAlpha :) I used the tongue smiley (:P) to ensure that no one gets the wrong message, but I guess &#8211; I should have been more clear with it.<br />
<br />
I&#8217;m always in favor of new startups and new search engines as I love to see the competition, so I won&#8217;t mind switching the search engine, if it&#8217;ll provide me the search results that I&#8217;m interested in. Guess what! now a days, I spend most of my time on Twitter and I make a point that while doing any research, I use Twitter&#8217;s search. :)<br />
<br />
Next time, I&#8217;ll be cautious before making these kind of PJs (poor jokes) :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek Khandelwal</title>
		<link>http://blogdesignstudio.com/mini-blog/why-wolframalpha-sucks-it-doesnt-know-what-wordpress-is/#comment-12109</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek Khandelwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogdesignstudio.com/mini-blog/why-wolframalpha-sucks-it-doesnt-know-what-wordpress-is/#comment-12109</guid>
		<description>I want to agree to what u said but fortunately Wolframalpha is a computational search engine. Try putting a mathematical query into it. It responds quite decently to it. 
Being die hard fans of google we would try to bash thing that says &quot; me kill google .&quot; 
But then google has its own share of puches and some body needs to come around say &quot; Hey -- hang on buddy &quot; . coz for sure the yahoo&#039;s and the msn&#039;s of the world have given up long time back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to agree to what u said but fortunately Wolframalpha is a computational search engine. Try putting a mathematical query into it. It responds quite decently to it.<br />
Being die hard fans of google we would try to bash thing that says &#8221; me kill google .&#8221;<br />
But then google has its own share of puches and some body needs to come around say &#8221; Hey &#8212; hang on buddy &#8221; . coz for sure the yahoo&#8217;s and the msn&#8217;s of the world have given up long time back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc M</title>
		<link>http://blogdesignstudio.com/mini-blog/why-wolframalpha-sucks-it-doesnt-know-what-wordpress-is/#comment-12108</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 01:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogdesignstudio.com/mini-blog/why-wolframalpha-sucks-it-doesnt-know-what-wordpress-is/#comment-12108</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t suck. It&#039;s not a search engine, never was. It&#039;s a &quot;computational knowledge engine&quot;. 

From Wolfram Alpha&#039;s own FAQ...

&quot;Is Wolfram&#124;Alpha a search engine?

No. It&#039;s a computational knowledge engine: it generates output by doing computations from its own internal knowledge base, instead of searching the web and returning links.&quot;

I enjoy your site and subscribe to your newsletter but please, please, please, don&#039;t go down the easy-answer, quick conclusion, stupid route. Dig just a little deeper.

Please don&#039;t let blogging maintain its (current) reputation of, mostly, biased and superficial &#039;journalism&#039;. 

Thanks, and I, generally, do love your blog.

Marc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t suck. It&#8217;s not a search engine, never was. It&#8217;s a &#8220;computational knowledge engine&#8221;. </p>
<p>From Wolfram Alpha&#8217;s own FAQ&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Is Wolfram|Alpha a search engine?</p>
<p>No. It&#8217;s a computational knowledge engine: it generates output by doing computations from its own internal knowledge base, instead of searching the web and returning links.&#8221;</p>
<p>I enjoy your site and subscribe to your newsletter but please, please, please, don&#8217;t go down the easy-answer, quick conclusion, stupid route. Dig just a little deeper.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t let blogging maintain its (current) reputation of, mostly, biased and superficial &#8216;journalism&#8217;. </p>
<p>Thanks, and I, generally, do love your blog.</p>
<p>Marc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

